Theoretical/Explanatory Frameworks

29th March 2018
AMBIT has a strong sense of Theory, but it particularly stresses Theory in Practice.

Sometimes different theoretical or explanatory frameworks, applied to the same problem in life, can appear frankly contradictory.

As a variety of interventions flow from these different explanatory frameworks, this can easily lead to services or teams inadvertently (out of the best of intentions) delivering interventions that lack overall coherence (see Dis-integratedInterventions).

AMBIT aims to explicitly to minimise this (see the one of the Core Features of AMBIT which is Taking Responsibility for integration.

An earlier version of AMBIT was called Integrative Multimodal Practice which emphasises how integration has been central theme of AMBIT from its inception.

Alongside integrative work with differnt theories and practices, there is also a pervasive emphasis on sensitivity to the Cultural Context and the involvement of users, 'Experts By Experience'.

Links


Attachment theory,
Mentalization,
Biology,
Psychodynamic theory,
SocialCognitiveTheory,
SocialEcology
SystemsTheory

SpecificEthnoSpiritualTheories

We leave this page open for editing by local users. Certainly Mentalization and The Therapist's Mentalizing Stance is a capacity or orientation that is well suited to trans-cultural working. Indeed, it has been argued that Mentalizing may have evolved as a capacity at least in part to allow the human species to make sense of different culturally-influenced manifestations of behaviour.